Perceptions of molecular epidemiology studies of HIV among stakeholders

  • Cynthia Schairer Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, CA, United States.
  • Sanjay R. Mehta | srmehta@ucsd.edu Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, CA; Department of Medicine, San Diego Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Diego, CA; Department of Pathology, University of California San Diego, CA, United States.
  • Staal A. Vinterbo Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, CA, United States.
  • Martin Hoenigl Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, CA, United States.
  • Michael Kalichman Department of Pathology, University of California San Diego, CA, United States.
  • Susan Little Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, CA, United States.

Abstract

Background: Advances in viral sequence analysis make it possible to track the spread of infectious pathogens, such as HIV, within a population. When used to study HIV, these analyses (i.e., molecular epidemiology) potentially allow inference of the identity of individual research subjects. Current privacy standards are likely insufficient for this type of public health research. To address this challenge, it will be important to understand how stakeholders feel about the benefits and risks of such research.
Design and Methods: To better understand perceived benefits and risks of these research methods, in-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with HIV-infected individuals, individuals at high-risk for contracting HIV, and professionals in HIV care and prevention. To gather additional perspectives, attendees to a public lecture on molecular epidemiology were asked to complete an informal questionnaire.
Results: Among those interviewed and polled, there was near unanimous support for using molecular epidemiology to study HIV. Questionnaires showed strong agreement about benefits of molecular epidemiology, but diverse attitudes regarding risks. Interviewees acknowledged several risks, including privacy breaches and provocation of anti-gay sentiment. The interviews also demonstrated a possibility that misunderstandings about molecular epidemiology may affect how risks and benefits are evaluated.
Conclusions: While nearly all study participants agree that the benefits of HIV molecular epidemiology outweigh the risks, concerns about privacy must be addressed to ensure continued trust in research institutions and willingness to participate in research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2017-12-13
Section
Original Articles
Keywords:
HIV, molecular epidemiology, qualitative interviews, privacy, research ethics
Statistics
Abstract views: 1356

PDF: 526
HTML: 111
Share it

PlumX Metrics

PlumX Metrics provide insights into the ways people interact with individual pieces of research output (articles, conference proceedings, book chapters, and many more) in the online environment. Examples include, when research is mentioned in the news or is tweeted about. Collectively known as PlumX Metrics, these metrics are divided into five categories to help make sense of the huge amounts of data involved and to enable analysis by comparing like with like.

How to Cite
Schairer, C., Mehta, S., Vinterbo, S., Hoenigl, M., Kalichman, M., & Little, S. (2017). Perceptions of molecular epidemiology studies of HIV among stakeholders. Journal of Public Health Research, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.4081/jphr.2017.992